Where Are We Now? Investment Treaty Arbitration, Sovereign Debt, and Mass Claims in the Post-Abaclat Era

J. Permesly
Permesly, Jennifer
M. Craven
Craven, Meredith

Article from: TDM 1 (2018), in Investor-State Disputes - International Investment Law

Abstract

In a watershed decision in 2011, an ICSID tribunal accepted jurisdiction over a mass claim brought by 180,000 Italian bondholders against the Republic of Argentina, alleging international law claims arising out of Argentina's sovereign debt default. In 2016, the Abaclat arbitration settled before a decision on the merits could be reached. This Article examines developments in mass claims and sovereign debt claims following the Abaclat jurisdictional decision. It examines procedural aspects of the Abaclat arbitration in order to assess what lessons can be learned about addressing mass ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

J. Permesly; M. Craven; "Where Are We Now? Investment Treaty Arbitration, Sovereign Debt, and Mass Claims in the Post-Abaclat Era"
TDM 1 (2018), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2530