The State Doesn't Strike Back After All: India's Final Model BIT Takes the Bite out of Investor Obligations and Eliminates State Counterclaims

E. Leikin
Leikin, Eric
S. Gadodia
Gadodia, Stuti
C. Loudon
Loudon, Charlie

Article from: TDM 2 (2018), in India

Executive Summary

In 2015, India unveiled first a new draft model BIT and then a significantly revised final version, on the basis of which it intends to re-negotiate all of its existing BITs, as well as any new agreements. Apparently heeding the calls of ISDS critics to "rebalance" arbitration, the Draft Model BIT set out expansive investor obligations and provided that any violation of the host State's domestic law could cause investors to be denied the benefit of treaty protection and/or give rise to State counterclaims. This constituted a striking departure from India's existing BITs, which do not ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

E. Leikin; S. Gadodia; C. Loudon; "The State Doesn't Strike Back After All: India's Final Model BIT Takes the Bite out of Investor Obligations and Eliminates State Counterclaims"
TDM 2 (2018), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2541