Evolution of the Indian Model Bilateral Investment Treaty Vis-a-Vis Investor-State Dispute Settlement Mechanism - A Balancing Act

R. Singh Sisodia
Singh Sisodia, Rohini
R. Raman
Raman, Ramya

Article from: TDM 2 (2018), in India

Executive Summary

In the aftermath of an increasing amount of investor-state disputes and awards causing financial turmoil, a global movement of transformation could be discerned in the international investment agreement regime. The Investor-State Dispute Settlement Mechanism (ISDS) system ostensibly tilted in favour of protection of investors' rights. The protection given to investors needed to be proportionate to their contribution to the economic and national development of the Host State, with a proper balance of rights and responsibilities. The international dispute settlement procedures should also ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

R. Singh Sisodia; R. Raman; "Evolution of the Indian Model Bilateral Investment Treaty Vis-a-Vis Investor-State Dispute Settlement Mechanism - A Balancing Act"
TDM 2 (2018), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2544