Article from: TDM 5 (2018), in Conferences
Abstract
The system of ISDS has come under fire as
one that is biased and in need of change. This paper addresses the impact that
party-appointed experts make to that argument when they act as advocates, and
suggests some ways the parties, counsel and a proactive arbitral tribunal can
minimize the problem of expert advocacy.
To read this article you need to be a subscriber
Subscribe
Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.
Subscribe now
Why subscribe?
TDM journal
Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)
OGEMID
OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)
Suggested Citation
R.E. Walck; "A Financial Perspective on Challenges to ISDS"
TDM 5 (2018), www.transnational-dispute-management.com
URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2593