Security for Costs and Third-Party Funding - An Analysis of Eskosol S.p.A. in liquidazione v. Italian Republic, Procedural Order No. 3 (Decision on Respondent's Request for Provisional Measures)

A.M. Steingruber
Steingruber, Andrea Marco

Article from: TDM 5 (2018), in Contingent Fees and Third Party Funding in Investment Arbitration Disputes

Introduction

The issues of security for costs and of disclosure of third-party funders remain heavily debated questions. This paper analyses closer the approach taken by the Tribunal in Eskosol S.p.A. in liquidazione v Italian Republic (hereinafter " Eskosol v. Italy ") when it issued Procedural Order No. 3 (Decision on Respondent's Request for Provisional Measures). The approach followed by the Tribunal chaired by Jean Kalicki (hereinafter known as the "Kalicki approach") is of interest for two notable reasons: 1. The first is that it seems to disjoin the ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

A.M. Steingruber; "Security for Costs and Third-Party Funding - An Analysis of Eskosol S.p.A. in liquidazione v. Italian Republic, Procedural Order No. 3 (Decision on Respondent's Request for Provisional Measures)"
TDM 5 (2018), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2596