The Fate of Investment Dispute Resolution after the Achmea Decision of the European Court of Justice

B. Hess
Hess, Burkhard

Article from: TDM 5 (2018), in EU, Investment Treaties, and Investment Treaty Arbitration - Current Developments and Challenges

Abstract

This article explores the contents and consequences of the Achmea judgment recently given by the European Court of Justice (6 March 2018, case C-284/16). In its first part, the article analyses the judgment from a European point of view. It notes that Achmea is primarily concerned with the autonomy of the EU legal order in international dispute resolution and only secondarily with investment arbitration. The judgment seamlessly ties in with the Court's Opinion 2/13 on the Accession of the EU to the European Convention of Human Rights. In its second part, the ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

B. Hess; "The Fate of Investment Dispute Resolution after the Achmea Decision of the European Court of Justice"
TDM 5 (2018), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2599