Rethinking ISDS

G. Kahale, III
Kahale, III, George

Article from: TDM 5 (2018), in Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement

Introduction

[Winner of the 2019 Burton Awards] The question of whether investor-state arbitration is broken, which this author posed in a 2012 article, is being increasingly answered with a resounding "yes," and no longer just by a few countries in Asia, Africa and Latin America, the traditional victims of claims that contracting states under investment treaties never imagined possible when they signed up for investor-state dispute settlement ("ISDS") mechanisms. In recent years, India, Indonesia, South Africa, Bolivia, Ecuador and Venezuela have all taken steps to terminate ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

G. Kahale, III; "Rethinking ISDS"
TDM 5 (2018), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2603