The Relevance of National Law and Contracts in Deciding the Compensation Due for Expropriation in Investor-State Arbitration: Lessons from Mobil v. Venezuela case

Y.Y. ZHANG
ZHANG, Yuan Yuan

Article from: TDM 7 (2018), in International Oil & Gas Arbitration

Abstract

[Added 22/01/2019] For foreign investors in the energy industry, expropriation remains a significant risk. If an expropriation takes place, losses will be likely, and disputes may arise. International investment treaties and contractual rights offer effective tools for the solutions of disputes arising out of expropriation. Nevertheless, it may be difficult for arbitral tribunals to decide the compensation due by host states for their expropriation measures, which is usually compulsory no matter whether the expropriation is legal or not. One of the difficulties that this ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

Y.Y. ZHANG; "The Relevance of National Law and Contracts in Deciding the Compensation Due for Expropriation in Investor-State Arbitration: Lessons from Mobil v. Venezuela case"
TDM 7 (2018), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2624