Twenty-Five Years of NAFTA Panel Review of Trade Remedy Determinations: Is Chapter 19 Still Relevant?

T.R. Posner
Posner, Theodore R.
N.W. Cunningham
Cunningham, Nathan W.

Article from: TDM 3 (2020), in USMCA - NAFTA

Introduction

In this article, we take a high-level look at Chapter 19's track record to see what it may tell us about the decision to keep the Chapter 19 regime intact in the USMCA. We examine trends in the review of U.S. AD and CVD determinations in an effort to identify any discernible evolution in how parties choose between the CIT and Chapter 19 panels. Following this Introduction, in Section II we briefly discuss the kinds of administrative determinations that may be reviewed by either the CIT or a binational panel. In Section III, we discuss the main differences between CIT review and ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

T.R. Posner; N.W. Cunningham; "Twenty-Five Years of NAFTA Panel Review of Trade Remedy Determinations: Is Chapter 19 Still Relevant?"
TDM 3 (2020), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2733