ISDS During a Period of Transformation. Favoring Domestic Courts and Selective Judicialization in USMCA

Ł Kułaga
Kułaga, Łukasz

Article from: TDM 3 (2020), in USMCA - NAFTA

Executive summary

The delegation by states through international investment agreements (IIA) of adjudicatory competences to arbitral tribunals without clear substantive or to some extent, procedural rules as well as lack of appeal mechanism raised significant controversies when those mechanisms began to be used by foreign investors in the late 90s of the 20th century. This article presents investment arbitration provisions of United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) in the broader context of the ongoing process of transformation in international investment law. Two main elements are highlighted. The ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

Ł Kułaga; "ISDS During a Period of Transformation. Favoring Domestic Courts and Selective Judicialization in USMCA"
TDM 3 (2020), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2741