US position on investment arbitration after Loewen

D.A. Gantz
Gantz, David A.

Article from: TDM 4 (2004), in Discussion / OGEMID

Introduction

The new U.S. 2004 model BIT (Pakistan, Uruguay) and the investment provisions of the Chile FTA, Singapore FTA and CAFTA, among many, all reflect this dichotomy between protecting foreign investors and minimising the risks when the U.S. is the respondent government. The U.S. government, as your message suggests, is in a very difficult position here, with pressure from some in Congress and many NGOs to seriously weaken foreign investment provisions. The business community is of course arguing in the other direction, and many in the U.S. government continue to recognize the need for ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

D.A. Gantz; "US position on investment arbitration after Loewen"
TDM 4 (2004), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=279