MTD Equity Sdn. Bhd. and MTD Chile S.A. v. Republic of Chile - Recent Developments in the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard

I.A. Laird
Laird, Ian

Article from: TDM 4 (2004), in Case Comments & Awards

Introduction

"Bilateral Investment Treaties are not insurance policies" and "NAFTA Tribunals are not Appellate Courts" - these are two favourite quotes of Tribunals and pundits who wish to make clear the scope and limitations of international investment treaties like the Malaysia-Chile BIT at issue in MTD Equity Sdn. Bhd. and MTD Chile S.A. v. Republic of Chile. [1] These statements of caution have been made by Tribunals concerned that Bilateral Investment Treaties ("BITs") will be interpreted too broadly. In particular, the fair and equitable treatment standard common ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

I.A. Laird; "MTD Equity Sdn. Bhd. and MTD Chile S.A. v. Republic of Chile - Recent Developments in the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard"
TDM 4 (2004), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=289