Two Indian Parties Can Choose a Foreign Seat: Party Autonomy Prevails in India

A. Vidyarthi
Vidyarthi, Abhisar

Article from: TDM 5 (2022), in Case Comments & Awards

Abstract

The right of two Indian parties to arbitrate at a foreign seat has been subject to a longstand-ing conflicted jurisprudence in India. In its recent decision in PASL Wind Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v GE Power Conversion India Pvt. Ltd, the Supreme Court of India finally settled this issue by unequivocally holding that two Indian parties may choose a foreign seat of arbitration and the award made at such arbitration would be a foreign award in an "international commercial arbitration," enforceable under Part II of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("Act"). In doing so, the ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

A. Vidyarthi; "Two Indian Parties Can Choose a Foreign Seat: Party Autonomy Prevails in India"
TDM 5 (2022), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2933