Words Matters After All! An Empirical Survey of How Tribunals Interpret Differently Three Types of FET Clauses and the Way it Impacts their Findings on Liability

P. Dumberry
Dumberry, Patrick

Article from: TDM 1 (2025), in Roundup of Articles

Introduction

In the last 15 years, a number of books, including one by the present author, and numerous articles have been published on the fair and equitable treatment ('FET') standard. The standard is found in the overwhelming majority of BITs and has become, in the last decades, one of the most controversial provisions examined by arbitral tribunals. According to a 2023 OECD paper, examining 2,670 treaties concluded by 99 jurisdictions, the FET clause is found in 95% of them. In a recent book, I have examined how tribunals have assessed FET clauses and their relationship with the Minimum ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

P. Dumberry; "Words Matters After All! An Empirical Survey of How Tribunals Interpret Differently Three Types of FET Clauses and the Way it Impacts their Findings on Liability"
TDM 1 (2025), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=3102