NAFTA Chapter 11 Dispute Settlement Mechanism and Mexico: Legitimacy, Evaluation and the Case for Transparency

S.P. de la Parra
Parra, Sergio Puig de la

Article from: TDM 4 (2004), in Investor-State Disputes - International Investment Law

Abstract

NAFTA's investor-state arbitration process has generated high levels of interest among international law scholars and practitioners. Numerous analysts have informed about the clashes among political, economic and social values that the Eleven Chapter of NAFTA and its Dispute Settlement Mechanism represent. However, little analyses have been conducted under an exclusive Mexican perspective. This article evaluates the effects of NAFTA Chapter 11 Dispute Settlement Mechanism in its tenth anniversary while responding to the question whether the mechanism confers more good ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

S.P. de la Parra; "NAFTA Chapter 11 Dispute Settlement Mechanism and Mexico: Legitimacy, Evaluation and the Case for Transparency"
TDM 4 (2004), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=311