Jurisdictional Challenges and Regulatory Uncertainty in Cryptocurrency Arbitration: A Comparative Study of Nigeria and Estonia

F. Chinaza Ibe
Chinaza Ibe, Favour

Article from: TDM 1 (2026), in Blockchain, Cryptocurrencies

Executive Summary

Cryptocurrency transactions increasingly give rise to cross-border disputes. However, the decentralised nature of digital assets continues to challenge traditional concepts of jurisdiction, applicable law, and enforcement in arbitration. While arbitration remains the preferred mechanism for resolving cryptocurrency-related disputes, regulatory uncertainty and divergent public policy considerations can significantly affect both the conduct of proceedings and the enforceability of awards. This paper examines these challenges through a comparative analysis of Nigeria and Estonia, ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

F. Chinaza Ibe; "Jurisdictional Challenges and Regulatory Uncertainty in Cryptocurrency Arbitration: A Comparative Study of Nigeria and Estonia"
TDM 1 (2026), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=3148