The Shadow Ledger in Digital Asset Arbitration: Platform Records, Control and Non-Party Infrastructure

D. Kolev
Kolev, Dimitar

Article from: TDM 1 (2026), in Blockchain, Cryptocurrencies

Executive Summary

(Addendum August 2026) Digital asset arbitration is often described through the language of blockchain transparency. That description is incomplete. In many disputes involving exchanges, custodians, OTC desks, liquidity providers, wallet infrastructure, platform groups and white-label structures, the decisive record is not the public blockchain but the internal platform record: an account balance, liquidation log, API instruction, withdrawal restriction, custody reconciliation, omnibus wallet allocation, compliance hold, access-control entry or risk flag. This article uses the ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

D. Kolev; "The Shadow Ledger in Digital Asset Arbitration: Platform Records, Control and Non-Party Infrastructure"
TDM 1 (2026), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=3179