Comment on Luke Peterson's letter to the FT "Bilateral trade deals with poorer nations fail to live up to the hype"

T. Weiler
Weiler, Todd

Article from: TDM 1 (2005), in Discussion / OGEMID

Introduction

Another postulation as to why "Canada" and the "USA" have been amending their BIT models - although it is not one to which I necessarily subscribe - would be that the bureaucrats in Canada and the US who actually dictate trade and investment policy, and who are primarily responsible for defending claims against their respective government colleagues, have lost sight of the overarching aims and benefits of trade and investment liberalization. They would be said to have lost the appropriate vision because of the success of the bilateral model itself, which largely takes the ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

T. Weiler; "Comment on Luke Peterson's letter to the FT "Bilateral trade deals with poorer nations fail to live up to the hype""
TDM 1 (2005), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=334