The Emperor's Clothes Come Off: A Comment on Republic of Ghana v. Telekom Malaysia Berhard, and the Problem of Arbitrator Conflict of Interest.

H. Mann
Mann, Howard

Article from: TDM 1 (2005), in Case Comments & Awards

Introduction

The question of whether a lawyer can serve as advocate in one investor-state arbitration while at the same time acting as an arbitrator in another has arisen in several discussions over the past few months. Most prominent among these now are the recent Dutch court decisions in the case of Republic of Ghana v Telekom Malaysia Berhard. These October and November 2004 decisions rule on a challenge to the participation of an arbitrator in an investor-state arbitration, on the basis that he was simultaneously serving as counsel to an investor in another case addressing a related point ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

H. Mann; "The Emperor's Clothes Come Off: A Comment on Republic of Ghana v. Telekom Malaysia Berhard, and the Problem of Arbitrator Conflict of Interest."
TDM 1 (2005), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=377