Most favoured nation treatment and dispute resolution under bilateral investment treaties: a turning point?

S. Fietta
Fietta, Stephen

Article from: TDM 3 (2005), in Investor-State Disputes - International Investment Law

Introduction

Two recent decisions on jurisdiction by ICSID tribunals indicate that investors will henceforward face difficulty in using "most favoured nation" ( "MFN" ) provisions in applicable bilateral investment treaties ("BITs" ) to establish jurisdiction over their investment disputes with host States. The decisions concerned ( Salini Costruttori S.p.A. and Italstrade S.p.A. v. The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan[1] ( "Salini" ) and Plama Consortium Ltd.v.. Republic of Bulgaria[2] ( "Plama" )) appear to represent a marked change in direction from the ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

S. Fietta; "Most favoured nation treatment and dispute resolution under bilateral investment treaties: a turning point?"
TDM 3 (2005), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=466