Is There Room for Customary Law in International Investment Law? (The Requirement of Continuous Corporate Nationality in the Loewen Case)

P. Acconci
Acconci, Pia

Article from: TDM 3 (2005), in Case Comments & Awards

Abstract

In its award of 26 June 2003, the ICSID arbitral Tribunal dismissed the claim of the Loewen Group, Inc., (TLGI) against the United States for lack of TLGI's continuous nationality. The Tribunal upheld the U.S.A.'s additional objection to its jurisdiction because of the change in the claimant's corporate structure and nationality following the reorganization plan approved by the Canadian and U.S. bankruptcy courts, while the ICSID proceedings were pending. In order to demonstrate that a claimant like TLGI could no longer bring a claim before ICSID arbitration ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

P. Acconci; "Is There Room for Customary Law in International Investment Law? (The Requirement of Continuous Corporate Nationality in the Loewen Case)"
TDM 3 (2005), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=479