Plama v. Bulgaria and the scope of investment treaty MFN clauses

N. Gallus
Gallus, Nick

Article from: TDM 3 (2005), in Case Comments & Awards

Introduction

Of all the contentious aspects of the emerging international investment treaty law, none appears to generate as much controversy as the scope of Most Favored Nation ("MFN") clauses. Investment treaty MFN clauses generally guarantee investors the best treatment offered by the host state to investors in any third country. The scope of such clauses was considered in the first investment treaty case at the ICSID, AAPL v. Sri Lanka.[1] After noting that "[t]he most-favored nation provision contained in Article 3 ... may be invoked to increase the host State's liability in case a ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

N. Gallus; "Plama v. Bulgaria and the scope of investment treaty MFN clauses"
TDM 3 (2005), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=481