Default Rule Theory and International Arbitration Law (with Comments on Expanded Review and Ex Parte Interim Relief)

C.R. Drahozal
Drahozal, Christopher R.

Article from: TDM 5 (2005), in International Commercial Arbitration

Introduction

Professor Ian Ayres identifies the "default revolution" as one of the "important normative results" of modern economic analysis of contract law.[1] By the "default revolution," Ayres means the widespread appreciation of the dichotomy between mandatory rules and default rules. A mandatory rule, of course, is a rule that the parties cannot contract around. By contrast, a default rule is a rule that the parties can contract around; it governs their contract, but only if the parties do not agree otherwise. [2] According to Ayres, it has "become almost impossible to write a contract ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

C.R. Drahozal; "Default Rule Theory and International Arbitration Law (with Comments on Expanded Review and Ex Parte Interim Relief)"
TDM 5 (2005), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=575