Council of Canadians and CUPW v. the Attorney General of Canada - A short case comment

Article from: TDM 5 (2005), in Case Comments & Awards

Introduction

The question of the constitutional validity of the various dispute settlement systems under NAFTA has arisen from time to time in all three NAFTA countries. Most recently, a coalition of public interest groups and labour unions has applied in the Superior Court of Justice of Ontario for a declaration against the constitutionality of the investor state dispute settlement provisions of Chapter 11 of NAFTA. The application was rejected by Justice Pepall, a leading commercial list judge on July 8, 2005. Justice Pepall reviews the provisions of NAFTA, various cases taken by ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

"Council of Canadians and CUPW v. the Attorney General of Canada - A short case comment"
TDM 5 (2005), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=614