Revisiting a Landmark: Indirect Expropriation and Fair and Equitable Treatment in the ICSID Case Tecmed

S.W. Schill
Schill, Stephan W.

Article from: TDM 2 (2006), in Case Comments & Awards

Introduction

Although the ICSID award in Tecnicas Medioambientales Tecmed S.A. v. The United Mexican States was handed down almost three years ago, revisiting the decision still seems a worthwhile endeavor. Not only has Tecmed been approved of in subsequent investment arbitrations,[1] but more importantly it lays the basis for a trend-setting approach to the concepts of indirect expropriation and fair and equitable treatment. With respect to both standard guarantees in international investment protection, Tecmed is a landmark decision with a methodological approach that ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

S.W. Schill; "Revisiting a Landmark: Indirect Expropriation and Fair and Equitable Treatment in the ICSID Case Tecmed"
TDM 2 (2006), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=710