The Interplay of Contract Claims and Treaty Claims: Bayindir v. Pakistan

L. Martinez
Martinez, Lucy
D. Bray
Bray, Daina

Article from: TDM 2 (2006), in Case Comments & Awards

Introduction

An increasingly common problem in the investor-State sphere is how to reconcile different dispute resolution mechanisms in a contract and a bilateral investment treaty ("BIT"). Often, a contract provides for disputes to be resolved through local courts in the host State, while an applicable BIT provides for disputes to be resolved through arbitration before the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ("ICSID"). If the foreign investor opts for ICSID arbitration under the BIT (before or after commencing local proceedings under the contract), the host State ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

L. Martinez; D. Bray; "The Interplay of Contract Claims and Treaty Claims: Bayindir v. Pakistan"
TDM 2 (2006), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=712