Investor' Rights and State Regulatory Autonomy: the Role of the Legitimate Expectation Principle in the CMS v. Argentina case

F. Costamagna
Costamagna, Francesco

Article from: TDM 2 (2006), in Case Comments & Awards

Introduction

The CMS Gas Transmission Company v. The Argentine Republic [1] was the first of the so-called "Argentine concession cases"[2] in which an ICSID Tribunal ordered Argentina to compensate a foreign investor for the emergency measures taken in response to the financial crisis that hit the country at the end of the 1990s. The award prompted fears of a possible "domino effect",[3] with the Argentine government threatening to use all possible domestic means to prevent its enforcement.[4] In the aftermath, such a Calvo-reminiscent strategy seems to have been discarded, turning to ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

F. Costamagna; "Investor' Rights and State Regulatory Autonomy: the Role of the Legitimate Expectation Principle in the CMS v. Argentina case"
TDM 2 (2006), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=720