Choice of Law Provisions when Drafting Arbitration Provisions for International Oil and Gas Agreements

A.B. Derman
Derman, Andrew B.
A. Golding
Golding, Anthony
M. Hallake
Hallake, Marcello
W.M. Katz Jr.
Katz Jr., William M.
P.A. Vermillion
Vermillion, Peter A.

Article from: TDM 2 (2006), in International Commercial Law

Introduction

In 1987, a Texas court applying New York law awarded Pennzoil Company over $7 billion in actual damages and $1 billion in punitive damages in a lawsuit against Texaco, Inc. That case, which sent one of the world's largest oil companies at the time into bankruptcy, is an example of the importance of choice of law. A key issue in the case was New York's requirement that binding agreements, even if preliminary, carry a duty of good faith performance. No such duty exists under Texas law. Would the result have been different if Texas law applied? Although the Pennzoil case is often ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

A.B. Derman; A. Golding; M. Hallake; W.M. Katz Jr.; P.A. Vermillion; "Choice of Law Provisions when Drafting Arbitration Provisions for International Oil and Gas Agreements"
TDM 2 (2006), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=746