The Case for Arbitration Rules that Presumptively Grant Public Access to All Arbitration Proceedings

J.M. Matthews
Matthews, Joseph

Article from: TDM 5 (2006), in Procedure, Advocacy, Strategy and Tactics in Arbitration

Introduction

It is the hypothesis of this article that learned commentators in the international arbitration community should urge reversal of the presumption that commercial arbitration proceedings and the materials created by parties to the arbitrations and submitted to arbitral tribunals, as well as the awards of the arbitrators should be conducted in secret except as required to enforce agreements to arbitrate or awards rendered by arbitral tribunals.[1] Starting with the currently pending proposed modifications to the UNCITRAL rules that have been published to the arbitration world for ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

J.M. Matthews; "The Case for Arbitration Rules that Presumptively Grant Public Access to All Arbitration Proceedings"
TDM 5 (2006), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=822