The ILC Articles on State Responsibility: the Paradoxical Relationship Between Form and Authority

D.D. Caron (†)
Caron (†), David D.

Article from: TDM 5 (2006), in International Law

Introduction

The adoption by the International Law Commission in 2001 of its Articles on State Responsibility is an achievement that presents a paradox. This essay is about the form and authority of the Articles, and the paradox by which they could have more influence as an ILC text than as a multilateral treaty. This essay addresses the questions of what is the appropriate authority to be given an ILC text, why an ILC text may be given undue influence (particularly by arbitral tribunals) and how an arbitral tribunal should approach interpreting and applying the ILC Articles on State ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

D.D. Caron (†); "The ILC Articles on State Responsibility: the Paradoxical Relationship Between Form and Authority"
TDM 5 (2006), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=881