The Doctrine of Indirect Expropriation in Light of the Practice of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal

V. Heiskanen
Heiskanen, Veijo

Article from: TDM 5 (2006), in Investor-State Disputes - International Investment Law

Introduction

A learned commentator has recently suggested that the focus of debate in international investment law has shifted from the standard of compensation to the definition of expropriation.[1] As a result of this shift, which has taken place in the context of the ongoing economic globalization and the global adoption of neo-liberal policies, the key issue in the field is no longer whether full or only "appropriate" compensation should be paid, but rather whether any expropriation has occurred in the first place. As the State increasingly withdraws from its role as an economic actor - ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

V. Heiskanen; "The Doctrine of Indirect Expropriation in Light of the Practice of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal"
TDM 5 (2006), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=885