Arbitration Without Privity and Russian Oil: the Yukos Case Before the Houston Court

M.M. Winkler
Winkler, Matteo M.

Article from: TDM 5 (2006), in Investor-State Disputes - International Investment Law

Introduction

Notwithstanding the judgment of February 24, 2005, one cannot say that the Yukos affair will not have further developments. In fact, counsel for Yukos even sought clarification of Judge Clark's decision by filing an appeal petition. Furthermore, Yukos's major shareholder, Group Menatep, requested arbitration, according to article 26 of the ECT and the rules of UNCITRAL, in the amount of $28 billion! These proceedings will follow the others currently still pending in front of the Russian courts, against both the Ministry of Finance and all companies involved in the YNG auction. In ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

M.M. Winkler; "Arbitration Without Privity and Russian Oil: the Yukos Case Before the Houston Court"
TDM 5 (2006), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=918