Comments To Jack C. Coe Jr's Article on Conciliation

N.D. Rubins
Rubins, Noah

Article from: TDM 1 (2007), in Mediation & ADR

Introduction

Professor Coe's thoughtful article underlines a paradoxical situation in relation to investment-related conciliation: while less adversarial ADR proceedings can over distinct advantages over litigated or arbitrated solutions, anecdotal evidence suggests that investors and States rarely engage in conciliation to re-solve their disputes.[1] Professor Coe rightly notes that the reasons for this situation are controversial, but a review of the most probable sources is illuminating. Counsel for the investor in one ICSID conciliation speculated that "[i]t may be that parties do not ...

To read this article you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Why subscribe?

TDM journal

Access to TDM Journal articles (well over 2500 articles in total for Premium account holders)

Legal & regulatory

Access to Legal & Regulatory data (well over 10000 documents)

OGEMID

OGEMID membership (lively discussion platform bringing together the world's international dispute management community)

Suggested Citation

N.D. Rubins; "Comments To Jack C. Coe Jr's Article on Conciliation"
TDM 1 (2007), www.transnational-dispute-management.com

URL: www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=962