Published 18 December 2019
Summary
In March 2019, the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) revealed proposals for amendment of its rules. These proposals have intensified the discussion of transparency and convergence in tribunal rulings. As part of this discussion, we analyze how tribunals approach valuation topics, using country risk premium (CRP) as an example. Our analysis focuses on how tribunals address five questions:
(1) should one include a country risk premium in the discount rate;
(2) what is the appropriate size of the country risk premium;
(3) what is the proper method to calculate the country risk premium;
(4) what is a suitable way to apply the country risk premium to a valuation model; and
(5) should expropriation risk be included as part of the country risk premium?
To read this article you need to be a subscriber
Subscribe
Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.
Subscribe now
Suggested Citation
M. Berberian; J. Cohen; E. Grgeta (2019, forthcoming) "Analyzing Country Risk Premium in ICSID Awards"
(TDM, ISSN 1875-4120) December 2019, www.transnational-dispute-management.com
Other recently published material:
Proving Impediments Associated with Performance of the Contractual Obligations during the Spread of COVID-19
2 June 2020
Now available in TDM 3 (2020): The Protection of Workers Rights Under the USMCA: A Brand-New Deal, A Paradigm Shift or A Missed Opportunity?
29 May 2020
The COVID-19 Crisis: Core Investment Law Issues Revisited
25 May 2020
Overlap of Insolvency and Arbitration Laws in India: How 'Virulent' are Insolvency Proceedings for Arbitrations
20 May 2020
The Façade of COVID-19 Class Action Litigation Against China Under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
13 May 2020
Complete listing of Advance publication.
