Published 18 December 2019
Summary
In March 2019, the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) revealed proposals for amendment of its rules. These proposals have intensified the discussion of transparency and convergence in tribunal rulings. As part of this discussion, we analyze how tribunals approach valuation topics, using country risk premium (CRP) as an example. Our analysis focuses on how tribunals address five questions:
(1) should one include a country risk premium in the discount rate;
(2) what is the appropriate size of the country risk premium;
(3) what is the proper method to calculate the country risk premium;
(4) what is a suitable way to apply the country risk premium to a valuation model; and
(5) should expropriation risk be included as part of the country risk premium?
To read this article you need to be a subscriber
Subscribe
Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.
Subscribe now
Suggested Citation
M. Berberian; J. Cohen; E. Grgeta (2019, forthcoming) "Analyzing Country Risk Premium in ICSID Awards"
(TDM, ISSN 1875-4120) December 2019, www.transnational-dispute-management.com
Other recently published material:
The Validity of Arbitral Awards and the Public Policy Nature of International Sanctions
11 March 2024
Now available "Climate Change Arbitration: Using the Energy Charter Treaty to Enforce the New European Green Deal" - TDM 1 (2024)
8 March 2024
Now available "Different Paths to the Same Goal? The Potential of BITs and FTAs for Achieving Climate Objectives" - TDM 1 (2024)
19 February 2024
How China's Anti-Foreign Sanctions Law Affects International Arbitration Proceedings in China
19 February 2024
La "Sede Ciudad de México" en el arbitraje comercial internacional bajo el contexto de la relocalización cercana en México. Consideraciones en base a un precedente judicial reciente
15 February 2024
Complete listing of Advance publication.