Published 18 December 2019
Summary
In March 2019, the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) revealed proposals for amendment of its rules. These proposals have intensified the discussion of transparency and convergence in tribunal rulings. As part of this discussion, we analyze how tribunals approach valuation topics, using country risk premium (CRP) as an example. Our analysis focuses on how tribunals address five questions:
(1) should one include a country risk premium in the discount rate;
(2) what is the appropriate size of the country risk premium;
(3) what is the proper method to calculate the country risk premium;
(4) what is a suitable way to apply the country risk premium to a valuation model; and
(5) should expropriation risk be included as part of the country risk premium?
To read this article you need to be a subscriber
Subscribe
Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.
Subscribe now
Suggested Citation
M. Berberian; J. Cohen; E. Grgeta (2019, forthcoming) "Analyzing Country Risk Premium in ICSID Awards"
(TDM, ISSN 1875-4120) December 2019, www.transnational-dispute-management.com
Other recently published material:
Arbitration Institutes as System Builders
19 March 2020
The Global South and State Aid Schemes: The Case of Legitimate Expectations for Investors
28 February 2020
Addendum TDM 1 (2020) - Comparative Analysis of Investment Provisions of the Regional Trade Agreements in the Eurasia Region: The Case of the Eurasian Economic Union and the EU Association Agreements with Moldova, Georgia and Ukraine
20 February 2020
International Arbitration in Dubai Courts: Let the Data Speak for Itself
19 February 2020
Investor-State Mediation - New Tools for Policy Makers
12 February 2020
Complete listing of Advance publication.
