Published 18 December 2019
Summary
In March 2019, the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) revealed proposals for amendment of its rules. These proposals have intensified the discussion of transparency and convergence in tribunal rulings. As part of this discussion, we analyze how tribunals approach valuation topics, using country risk premium (CRP) as an example. Our analysis focuses on how tribunals address five questions:
(1) should one include a country risk premium in the discount rate;
(2) what is the appropriate size of the country risk premium;
(3) what is the proper method to calculate the country risk premium;
(4) what is a suitable way to apply the country risk premium to a valuation model; and
(5) should expropriation risk be included as part of the country risk premium?
To read this article you need to be a subscriber
Subscribe
Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.
Subscribe now
Suggested Citation
M. Berberian; J. Cohen; E. Grgeta (2019, forthcoming) "Analyzing Country Risk Premium in ICSID Awards"
(TDM, ISSN 1875-4120) December 2019, www.transnational-dispute-management.com
Other recently published material:
Arbitrability of Competition Law Disputes in India
18 January 2021
Africa's Investment Treaty Practice with China: Are the Africa-China BITs Conducive to the Implementation of the AU Agenda 2063?
8 January 2021
Now available in TDM 1 (2021): Punitive Damages in the Context of Maritime Arbitration: Myth or Reality? Lessons Drawn from the American Perspective and the Existing Practice of the Society of Maritime Arbitrators
6 January 2021
The Return of the Home State to Investor-State Disputes: Bringing Back Diplomatic Protection?; Rodrigo Polanco - Book Review
6 January 2021
Halliburton v Chubb: UK Supreme Court Judgment Determines Arbitrator Impartiality and Disclosure Duty
15 December 2020
Complete listing of Advance publication.
