Published 18 December 2019
Summary
In March 2019, the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) revealed proposals for amendment of its rules. These proposals have intensified the discussion of transparency and convergence in tribunal rulings. As part of this discussion, we analyze how tribunals approach valuation topics, using country risk premium (CRP) as an example. Our analysis focuses on how tribunals address five questions:
(1) should one include a country risk premium in the discount rate;
(2) what is the appropriate size of the country risk premium;
(3) what is the proper method to calculate the country risk premium;
(4) what is a suitable way to apply the country risk premium to a valuation model; and
(5) should expropriation risk be included as part of the country risk premium?
To read this article you need to be a subscriber
Subscribe
Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.
Subscribe now
Suggested Citation
M. Berberian; J. Cohen; E. Grgeta (2019, forthcoming) "Analyzing Country Risk Premium in ICSID Awards"
(TDM, ISSN 1875-4120) December 2019, www.transnational-dispute-management.com
Other recently published material:
Enka v Chubb: UK Supreme Court Judgment Determines the Applicable Law of the Arbitration Agreement
16 October 2020
Book Review - Attribution in International Law and Arbitration by Carlo de Stefano
12 October 2020
The Getma v Guinea Legal Saga: Exploring Future Directions for Investment Arbitration in Africa
29 September 2020
Crónica sobre la solución de controversias en materia de inversiones extranjeras: práctica española (2019)
24 September 2020
A Dispute at What Time? The 'Point of Dispute' Test, Exclusion Clauses, and the Application of Ratione Temporis in International Investment Law
17 September 2020
Complete listing of Advance publication.
