Published 18 December 2019
Summary
In March 2019, the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) revealed proposals for amendment of its rules. These proposals have intensified the discussion of transparency and convergence in tribunal rulings. As part of this discussion, we analyze how tribunals approach valuation topics, using country risk premium (CRP) as an example. Our analysis focuses on how tribunals address five questions:
(1) should one include a country risk premium in the discount rate;
(2) what is the appropriate size of the country risk premium;
(3) what is the proper method to calculate the country risk premium;
(4) what is a suitable way to apply the country risk premium to a valuation model; and
(5) should expropriation risk be included as part of the country risk premium?
To read this article you need to be a subscriber
Subscribe
Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.
Subscribe now
Suggested Citation
M. Berberian; J. Cohen; E. Grgeta (2019, forthcoming) "Analyzing Country Risk Premium in ICSID Awards"
(TDM, ISSN 1875-4120) December 2019, www.transnational-dispute-management.com
Other recently published material:
Understanding the Intersection of Insolvency and Arbitration Laws in the Indian Context
5 August 2020
Investment Disputes Involving Mineral Assets: Relevant Statistics & Trends
31 July 2020
The Overlap Between Bankruptcy Courts and Arbitration in the United States: Is a Preference for Arbitration the Key to Breaking the Loop?
23 July 2020
"The End is Near, Chaos Ensues" Consequences of the Termination Agreement in EU Arbitral Proceedings: Present & Future
6 July 2020
A Legal Perspective on Covid-19 in Egypt: The Impact on Civil and Administrative Contracts
30 June 2020
Complete listing of Advance publication.
