Published 18 December 2019
Summary
In March 2019, the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) revealed proposals for amendment of its rules. These proposals have intensified the discussion of transparency and convergence in tribunal rulings. As part of this discussion, we analyze how tribunals approach valuation topics, using country risk premium (CRP) as an example. Our analysis focuses on how tribunals address five questions:
(1) should one include a country risk premium in the discount rate;
(2) what is the appropriate size of the country risk premium;
(3) what is the proper method to calculate the country risk premium;
(4) what is a suitable way to apply the country risk premium to a valuation model; and
(5) should expropriation risk be included as part of the country risk premium?
To read this article you need to be a subscriber
Subscribe
Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.
Subscribe now
Suggested Citation
M. Berberian; J. Cohen; E. Grgeta (2019, forthcoming) "Analyzing Country Risk Premium in ICSID Awards"
(TDM, ISSN 1875-4120) December 2019, www.transnational-dispute-management.com
Other recently published material:
Algunas consideraciones entorno a la protección efectiva de las inversiones del sector energético en México
26 July 2022
New Frontiers in Asia-Pacific International Arbitration and Dispute Resolution - Book Review
1 July 2022
Forming Transnational Dispute Settlement Norms: Soft Law and the Role of UNCITRAL's Regional Centre for Asia and the Pacific - Book Review
1 July 2022
From Protection to Facilitation Agreements: Contributions of The Pan-African Investment Code, the Brazilian Model, and the New Regional and Multilateral Foreign Investments Agreements
27 June 2022
Oded Besserglik v Mozambique: Lessons for Improving Investor-State Dispute Settlement in Africa
27 June 2022
Complete listing of Advance publication.
