Published 18 December 2019
Summary
In March 2019, the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) revealed proposals for amendment of its rules. These proposals have intensified the discussion of transparency and convergence in tribunal rulings. As part of this discussion, we analyze how tribunals approach valuation topics, using country risk premium (CRP) as an example. Our analysis focuses on how tribunals address five questions:
(1) should one include a country risk premium in the discount rate;
(2) what is the appropriate size of the country risk premium;
(3) what is the proper method to calculate the country risk premium;
(4) what is a suitable way to apply the country risk premium to a valuation model; and
(5) should expropriation risk be included as part of the country risk premium?
To read this article you need to be a subscriber
Subscribe
Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.
Subscribe now
Suggested Citation
M. Berberian; J. Cohen; E. Grgeta (2019, forthcoming) "Analyzing Country Risk Premium in ICSID Awards"
(TDM, ISSN 1875-4120) December 2019, www.transnational-dispute-management.com
Other recently published material:
The Overlap Between Insolvency Proceedings and Arbitration: The Potential for Abuse and Inconsistent Results?
30 March 2021
Exploring the Intersection of Insolvency and Arbitration Proceedings in Australia, Malaysia, and Singapore
26 March 2021
Court of Arbitration for Sport: A Forgotten Model for ISDS?
24 March 2021
Liquidated Damages for Late/Non-Compliance with an Arbitration Award - Dealing with the Prohibition of Riba under Shari'ah in Awarding Post-Award Interest in International Arbitration
19 March 2021
Now available in TDM 6 (2020): When Capital Meets Custom. (How) Can State-Controlled Enterprises Contribute to the Formation/Identification of Customary International (Investment) Law?
18 March 2021
Complete listing of Advance publication.
