Published 18 December 2019
Summary
In March 2019, the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) revealed proposals for amendment of its rules. These proposals have intensified the discussion of transparency and convergence in tribunal rulings. As part of this discussion, we analyze how tribunals approach valuation topics, using country risk premium (CRP) as an example. Our analysis focuses on how tribunals address five questions:
(1) should one include a country risk premium in the discount rate;
(2) what is the appropriate size of the country risk premium;
(3) what is the proper method to calculate the country risk premium;
(4) what is a suitable way to apply the country risk premium to a valuation model; and
(5) should expropriation risk be included as part of the country risk premium?
To read this article you need to be a subscriber
Subscribe
Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.
Subscribe now
Suggested Citation
M. Berberian; J. Cohen; E. Grgeta (2019, forthcoming) "Analyzing Country Risk Premium in ICSID Awards"
(TDM, ISSN 1875-4120) December 2019, www.transnational-dispute-management.com
Other recently published material:
The Paris Agreement, Net Zero Energy Transition, and Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Aligning the Investment Treaty System with Climate Change Law & Policy
31 January 2023
Climate Action or Inaction: A New Space for the Full Protection and Security Standard?
31 January 2023
Current Trends in the Investment Environmental Jurisprudence and Predictions for Investment Disputes Involving Climate Change
24 January 2023
Climate Change and the Territoriality of International Investment Agreements
20 January 2023
International Investment Arbitration and the Environment: In the Search for Coexistence
20 January 2023
Complete listing of Advance publication.
