A Case for Public Interest Considerations in Merger Control Analysis with Reference to Competition Law Enforcement in Developing Countries: The Example of South Africa
-
-
E.C. Uwadi
Published 15 April 2020
Introduction
This article is written in defense of the diverse policy objectives of competition regimes in relation to merger control in the developing countries of Africa. While appreciating the criticisms, the essay uses South Africa as an example to explain the historical context and justify such a regime. It reviews the extent of PIC in line with the South African merger control regime, analyzes the various arguments for and against the inclusion of PICs in merger control analysis and comes to the conclusion that PICs ought to be considered in developing countries’ merger control as these considerations play a very key role in stabilizing the fragile economy of emerging markets. This essay equally suggests that clear procedures for analyzing the PICs should be adopted and put to paper in order to protect the process from being subjected to regulatory arbitrariness and abuse.
This paper will be part of the second TDM Special Issue on "The African Continental Free Trade Agreement (AfCFTA)". More information here www.transnational-dispute-management.com/news.asp?key=1809
To read this article you need to be a subscriber
Subscribe
Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.
Subscribe now
Suggested Citation
E.C. Uwadi (2020, forthcoming) "A Case for Public Interest Considerations in Merger Control Analysis with Reference to Competition Law Enforcement in Developing Countries: The Example of South Africa"
(TDM, ISSN 1875-4120) April 2020, www.transnational-dispute-management.com
Other recently published material:
The UNCITRAL Toolkit on Prevention and Mitigation of International Investment Disputes: A Case for Advancing Transparency in ISDS
11 August 2026
Addendum TDM 1 (2026): Crypto Assets and the International Investment Regime: Private Law Foundations, Regulatory Architecture, and the New Frontier of Treaty Arbitration
7 August 2026
Addendum TDM 1 (2026): The Shadow Ledger in Digital Asset Arbitration: Platform Records, Control and Non-Party Infrastructure
6 August 2026
So Sayeth Congress? 100 Years of the Federal Courts' Maintenance of the Federal Arbitration Act
28 July 2026
Now Available in TDM 2 (2026): Sanctions as International Public Policy in Arbitration: Reconciling Enforcement Under Article V(2)(b) of the New York Convention Through a Structured Proportionality Framework
20 July 2026
Complete listing of Advance publication.