Indirect Expropriations in International Investment Law and in Brazil: A Cross-Regime Approach
-
-
O.J. Guterres Costa Junior
-
-
J. Marinho Séves Santos
Published 27 October 2021
Abstract
Brazilian law does not present any provision forbidding indirect expropriation. However, the Brazilian Federal Constitution offers property rights a high degree of protection. Scholars point out that indirect expropriation should, then, be considered unconstitutional. There is, however, no parameter available for practitioners to determine that a certain regulation had expropriatory effect. This paper proposes that parameters currently used in international investment law might be used by Brazilian courts.
This paper will be part of the TDM Special Issue on "The Future of Investment Law in Latin America". More information here www.transnational-dispute-management.com/news.asp?key=1842
To read this article you need to be a subscriber
Subscribe
Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.
Subscribe now
Suggested Citation
O.J. Guterres Costa Junior; J. Marinho Séves Santos (2021, forthcoming) "Indirect Expropriations in International Investment Law and in Brazil: A Cross-Regime Approach"
(TDM, ISSN 1875-4120) October 2021, www.transnational-dispute-management.com
Other recently published material:
Transnational Investment State Arbitration: A New Game-Changer for Global Climate Change Goals
20 March 2023
Summary of Young-OGEMID Symposium No. 14: "International Arbitration and International Commercial Courts: Competitive or Complementary?" (March 2022)
3 March 2023
Compliance with the AfCFTA: Is There any Room for Hope?
1 March 2023
La protection de l'environnement dans l'accord créant la zone de libre-échange continentale africaine
27 February 2023
Access to Justice in International Investment Dispute Settlement in Times of Economic Nationalism: The Case of Swissbourgh Diamond Mines Limited and Others versus The Kingdom of Lesotho
22 February 2023
Complete listing of Advance publication.
