First Majestic Silver Corp. v United Mexican States - ICSID Case No. ARB/21/14 - NAFTA - Decision on Claimant's Second Request for Provisional Measures - 29 January 2026

Country
Year

2026

Summary

Source: icsid.worldbank.org

...

91. Since the Tribunal rejects the Claimant's suspension request on the basis that NAFTA Article 1134 does not allow the suspension of PEM's 2012 Tax Reassessment, the Tribunal need not consider the Respondent's other objections. As explained in para. 76 above, the lack of any single requirement under the NAFTA or ICSID provisions prevents the Tribunal from granting the Claimant's requested provisional measures.

V. Decision

92. For the above reasons, the Tribunal unanimously decides as follows:

(1) Rejects the Claimant's Second Request;

(2) Reserves to the Award the decision on the allocation of costs resulting from the Claimant's Second Request.

...

To download this document you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Documents missing? Documents to share? Let us know!

If you know of documents which are currently missing from our Legal & Regulatory database do let us know. You can send them directly to us for inclusion in the database, anonymously or otherwise.
Learn more here