Published 4 May 2021
Abstract
This Paper sets out to provide a brief introduction to the much under-appreciated and under used Islamic dispute resolution (‘IDR’) procedure with a view to explaining how it sits alongside conventional Alternative Dispute Resolution (‘ADR’) methods of dispute resolution. It draws upon the differences and similarities between the two systems. A detailed understanding of the two, it argues, enables one to use IDR dispute resolution processes effectively and efficiently, based on a comprehensive understanding of well-known Islamic legal paradigms, which can prove to be of great utility for the wider ADR community.
This paper will be part of the TDM Special Issue on "Islamic Finance and Dispute Resolution". More information here www.transnational-dispute-management.com/news.asp?key=1832
To read this article you need to be a subscriber
Subscribe
Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.
Subscribe now
Suggested Citation
T. Mahmood; S. Juss; A. Dowling-Hussey (2021, forthcoming) "Islamic Dispute Resolution versus Conventional Alternative Dispute Resolution"
(TDM, ISSN 1875-4120) May 2021, www.transnational-dispute-management.com
Other recently published material:
The Validity of Arbitral Awards and the Public Policy Nature of International Sanctions
11 March 2024
Now available "Climate Change Arbitration: Using the Energy Charter Treaty to Enforce the New European Green Deal" - TDM 1 (2024)
8 March 2024
Now available "Different Paths to the Same Goal? The Potential of BITs and FTAs for Achieving Climate Objectives" - TDM 1 (2024)
19 February 2024
How China's Anti-Foreign Sanctions Law Affects International Arbitration Proceedings in China
19 February 2024
La "Sede Ciudad de México" en el arbitraje comercial internacional bajo el contexto de la relocalización cercana en México. Consideraciones en base a un precedente judicial reciente
15 February 2024
Complete listing of Advance publication.