Content Join OGEMID
 
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Rss

Transnational Dispute Management

Skip navigation

Transnational Dispute Management

The network for international arbitration, mediation and ADR, international investment law and Transnational Dispute Management

Join OGEMID

Transnational Dispute Management

The network for international arbitration, mediation and ADR, international investment law and Transnational Dispute Management

  • Sign in
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • Sign in
  • About About
    1. Home
    2. About
    3. About TDM
    4. About TDM
    5. Founding Editor T.W. Wälde
    6. T.W. Wälde
    7. Editorial team
    8. Editorial team
    9. Contributing Authors
    10. Contributing Authors
    11. Subscriptions
    12. Subscriptions
  • Journal Journal
    1. Home
    2. Journal
    3. Browse Issues
    4. Browse
    5. Articles by Category
    6. By Category
    7. Articles by Author
    8. By Author
    9. Advance publication
    10. Advance publication
    11. Specials
    12. Specials
    13. Search
    14. Search
    15. Book reviews
    16. Reviews
  • Legal & Regulatory docs. L & r docs
    1. Home
    2. Legal & Regulatory docs.
    3. L&R by Country
    4. L&R by Country
    5. L&R by Category
    6. L&R by Category
    7. L&R recent additions
    8. L&R recent additions
    9. Search
    10. Search
  • Audiovisual library AV library
    1. Home
    2. Audiovisual library
    3. Audiovisual Library
    4. Audiovisual Library
    5. TDM/OGEMID Interviews
    6. TDM/OGEMID Interviews
    7. Conference presentations
    8. Conference presentations
  • OGEMID OGEMID
    1. Home
    2. OGEMID
    3. About OGEMID
    4. About OGEMID
    5. Suggest a topic
    6. Suggest a topic
    7. Guest programme
    8. Guest programme
    9. Seminar programme
    10. Seminar programme
    11. Browse archive
    12. Browse archive
    13. Search
    14. Search
    15. Join
    16. Join
  • News & Events Events
    1. Home
    2. News & Events
    3. News
    4. News
    5. Events
    6. Events
  • Subscribe
Home > Legal & Regulatory docs.

The Islamic Republic of Iran v United States of America - Iran-United States Claims Tribunal (IUSCT) Partial Award No 604 in case No A15-II-A - Partially Dissenting Opinion of Judge Bruno Simma on the Meaning of the Term Iranian Properties - 10 March 2020

  • Sign in to download document
Country
  • Iran (Islamic Republic of)
  • United States
Year

2020

Summary

IRAN-UNITED STATES CLAIMS TRIBUNAL
PARTIALLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE BRUNO SIMMA ON THE MEANING OF THE TERM "IRANIAN PROPERTIES"

I. INTRODUCTION: APPLICABLE LAW AND TREATY INTERPRETATION

1. While I find myself in agreement with most of the decisions and reasoning adopted by the Majority, I hold a different view with regard to the definition by the Majority of the term "Iranian properties" and, hence, to the scope ratione materiae of the obligation contained in Paragraph 9. The Majority claims that the interpretation of this treaty provision on the basis of the pertinent rules of public international law opens the way, indeed necessarily leads, to the definition of "Iranian properties" by way of exclusive application of a conflict-of-law analysis. According to the Majority, this method is to be applied to all items in question in the present case: extra legem rei sitae nulla salus. With all due respect, I see things differently: I base what I consider to be the correct view on the existence of a shared understanding by the Parties to the General Declaration of 19 January 1981, maintained over a long time, that by "Iranian properties" were to be understood assets fully paid for by the Claimant which would not qualify as "Iranian" according to the Majority's conflict-of-law analysis.

2. Paragraph 9 of the General Declaration of 19 January 1981 reads as follows: "9. Commencing with the adherence by Iran and the United States to this Declaration and the attached Claims Settlement Agreement (...), the United States will arrange, subject to the provisions of U.S. law applicable prior to November 14, 1979, for the transfer to Iran of all Iranian properties which are located in the United States and abroad and which are not within the scope of the preceding paragraphs."

3. I am not persuaded by the reasoning of the Majority, set out in paragraphs 93 to 164 of the Partial Award, according to which a state-of-the-art interpretation of the term "Iranian properties" in Paragraph 9 will lead to a clear and unambiguous result insofar as, in a first step, it will lead us to the concept of "ownership", whose substance in turn is to be determined by reference to "title", the passage of which, in a second step, needs to be assessed either by reference to the law designated by the contract of sales governing each transaction or, by default, by reference to the universally accepted rule of conflict of laws applicable to the transfer of title, namely the lex rei sitae /lex situs. If what is before us were a regular commercial case, I would share such a private law approach without hesitation. In the context of the Hostage crisis and the Algiers Accords, however, it is unconvincing and, much to my regret, I cannot subscribe to it.

4. I would have no objection to the reasoning of the Majority if it were not for the fact that the instrument at the basis of the present case is an international treaty. The Majority view pays lip service to this fact by subjecting this treaty to an interpretation which the Majority claims to be in accordance with the respective rules of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, but unfortunately this exercise is cut short half-way by the claim that its result is already to be found in the Tribunal's Partial Award 529, embodied in the notion of "title". I would submit that the main flaw of the Majority's view ultimately consists in its very premise that the term "Iranian properties" has a clear and unambiguous meaning. This premise limits the scope of Paragraph 9 to an extent that, in my view, does violence to an interpretation of the Algiers Declaration made in good faith as well as against the background of the Declaration's specific political context.

...

Footnotes omitted.

Partial Award: The Islamic Republic of Iran v United States of America - Iran-United States Claims Tribunal (IUSCT) Partial Award No 604 in case No A15-II-A - 10 March 2020

To download this document you need to be a subscriber

Sign in

Forgot password?

Sign in

Subscribe

Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote.

Subscribe now

Documents missing? Documents to share? Let us know!

If you know of documents which are currently missing from our Legal & Regulatory database do let us know. You can send them directly to us for inclusion in the database, anonymously or otherwise.
Learn more here

Call for contributions

TDM Call for Papers: Sanctions and International Arbitration: Impact on Substantive and Procedural Issues

Ali Burney, Rinat Gareev, Kiran Nasir Gore, Dini Sejko, Prof. Joel Slawotsky, May Tai

  • Ali Burney
  • Rinat Gareev
  • Kiran Gore
  • Dr Dini Sejko
  • Prof. Joel Slawotsky
  • May Tai

TDM Call for Papers: National Courts as a Forum for the Resolution of Disputes under Article 26 Energy Charter Treaty

John P. Gaffney, Dr. iur Richard Happ,
Lucia Raimanova, Anna-Maria Tamminen, Dr. Catharine Titi

  • John P. Gaffney
  • Dr. iur Ricard Happ
  • Lucia Raimanova
  • Anna-Maria Tamminen
  • Dr. Catharine Titi

TDM Call for Papers: International Investment Arbitration - Environmental Protection and Climate Change Issues

Professor Dr A F M Maniruzzaman, Wendy J. Miles QC, Carla Lewis, Dr Stephen Minas

  • Professor Dr A F M Maniruzzaman
  • Wendy J. Miles QC
  • Carla Lewis
  • Dr Stephen Minas

TDM Call for Papers: The African Continental Free Trade Agreement (AfCFTA)

J. Chaisse, J. Górski, E. Laryea, M.M. Mbengue, and K. Olaoye

  • Prof. Julien Chaisse
  • Dr. Jedrzej Gorski
  • Prof. Emmanuel Laryea
  • Prof. Makane Moïse Mbengue
  • Kehinde Olaoye
  • More
  • Contribute

Advance publication

Consequences of Not Regulating Third-Party Funding in Commercial Arbitration in Ecuador

24 Mar 2023

D.F. Ibarra Villacís

  • D.F. Ibarra Villacís

Transnational Investment State Arbitration: A New Game-Changer for Global Climate Change Goals

20 Mar 2023

I.D. Valones

  • I.D. Valones

Summary of Young-OGEMID Symposium No. 14: "International Arbitration and International Commercial Courts: Competitive or Complementary?" (March 2022)

3 Mar 2023

E.S. Delgado

  • E.S. Delgado
  • More
  • Contribute

Stay connected

Sign up for our email alerts.

  • Issues
  • Advance publication
  • News
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • RSS

Join the debate

Want to join OGEMID, the leading on-line discussion platform for international dispute resolution?

Simply fill in the registration form to start your trial membership.

Download the app

  1. App store
  2. Google play

The Transnational Dispute Management Journal (TDM, ISSN 1875-4120) and OGEMID listserv focus on recent developments in the area of (investment) arbitration and dispute management, regulation, treaties, judicial and arbitral cases, voluntary guidelines, tax and contracting. Read our Terms & Conditions here, and our Privacy Policy here.

About TDM

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Contribute
  • Subscriptions
  • Contact
  • Help

Other publications

  • Oil, Gas & Energy Law Intelligence (OGEL)

© 2004 - 2023. Published by MARIS.

  • Home
  • Contribute
  • Subscriptions
  • Contact
  • Help